Perbedaan usia dalam bias korespondensi: Peran dari attitude diagnosticity yang dibatasi secara sosial
Syadelia Wahyu Pramesti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nur Fadhilah Muslichah Saefudin, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Kamiliya Syafiqa Nailah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mutiara Indah Apriliani, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Daffa Pradiftya Al Ayubi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Bias korespondensi adalah sebuah kondisi ketika seseorang menyimpulkan perilaku asli individu lain berdasarkan perilaku yang terlihat walaupun terdapat pembatasan sosial terhadap perilaku tersebut yang didasari oleh adanya persepsi sosial. Personal beliefs yang dimiliki individu dengan usia tertentu dapat mempengaruhi atribusi sikap. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan bias korespondensi berdasarkan perbedaan usia yang dikategorikan berdasarkan generasi Y (tahun 1981-1996) dan generasi Z (tahun 1997-2012). Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari 32 partisipan yang telah dikelompokkan sesuai dengan generasi dan dikumpulkan secara online melalui google form. Berdasarkan analisis ANCOVA yang dilakukan, menunjukkan bahwa attitude diagnosticity tidak berpengaruh terhadap bias korespondensi (F(1, 23)=0.740, p=0.339) dan essay direction berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap bias korespondensi (F(1, 23)=22.211, p<.001). Hal tersebut didukung oleh hasil uji Post Hoc Test (SE=0.493, t=4.71, p<.001) dan independent samples t-test (p=0.660). Secara keseluruhan, essay direction secara signifikan lebih berpengaruh terhadap bias korespondensi daripada faktor-faktor yang lain.
Kata kunci: diagnostik sikap; bias korespondensi; perbedaan usiaKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk Tahun 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Diakses dari https://demakkab.bps.go.id/news/2021/01/21/67/hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2010). Making attributions for behaviors: The prevalence of correspondence bias in the general population. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.495654
Blanchard-Fields, F. (1996). Causal attributions across the adult life span: The influence of social schemas, life context, and domain specificity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199611)10:7
Coats, A. H., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2013). Making judgments about other people: Impression formation and attributional processing in older adults. Aging Embodiment and The Search for Social Change, 8(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.12199
Horhota, M., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2006). Beliefs and attributional complexity influence age differences in the correspondence bias?. Social Cognition, 24(3), 310-337. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.310
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
Jones, E. E., & Riggs, J. M., & Quattrone, G. (1979). Observer bias in the attitude attribution paradigm: Effect of time and information order. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(7), 1230-1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1230
Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. [R package]. Diakses dari https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans
Lestari, B. D., & Suprapti, V. (2018). Proses pencapaian happiness pada pasangan suami istri yang mengalami involuntary childless. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Perkembangan, 7(4), 56-64.
Meidina, A., & Puspita, M. (2023). Childfree practices in Indonesia: Study in the response of Islamic Community Organizations in Kebumen District. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 7(1) 17-32. https://doi.org/10.21009/hayula.007.01.02
Miller, A. G., Ashton, W., & Mishal, M. (1990). Beliefs concerning the features of constrained behavior: A basis for the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.635
Miyamoto, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2002). Cultural variation in correspondence bias: The critical role of attitude diagnosticity of socially constrained behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1239-1248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1239
R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Diakses dari https://cran.r-project.org
Rizka, S. M., dkk. (2021). Childfree phenomenon in Indonesia. Proceedings of The 11th Annual International Conference (AIC) on Social Sciences
Stanley, J. T., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2011). Beliefs about behavior account for age differences in the correspondence bias. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 66(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq078
Stratton, S. (2021). Population research: Convenience Sampling Strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000649
Supriatna, E. (2023). Being a childfree man in Indonesia: Facing challenges and social stigma in choosing the freedom without children. Tec Empresarial Journal, 18(1), 254-265.
The Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi (Version 2.3). Diakses dari https://www.jamovi.org
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ap.v6i2.72090
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our Journal is Indexed by:
Acta Psychologia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/acta-psychologia/.