Email this article Dari terminologi ke subtansi pendidikan kewarganegaraan: Implikasi terhadap revitalisasi Pancasila
WInarno Winarno, Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Artikel ini mengeksplorasi berbagai istilah (terminologi) yang berkaitan dengan praktik kewarganegaraan atau pendidikan kewarganegaraan yang digunakan di Indonesia setelah runtuhnya rezim Orde Baru. Ia berpendapat bahwa penggunaan istilah tersebut agak serampangan karena mereka kurang dibahas dan diperebutkan di kalangan akademis. Akibatnya, agak membingungkan ketika pemerintah Indonesia berniat untuk memperkenalkan kembali Pendidikan Pancasila baru-baru ini. Makalah ini menyarankan bahwa penggunaan istilah-istilah tersebut secara konsisten dan sistematis akan memungkinkan kita untuk menempatkan Pancasila secara lebih proporsional dalam “peta” Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia (Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, PKn).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
practices of citizenship or civic education used in Indonesia after the demise of the New Order regime. It argues that the use of the terms has been rather haphazard because they have been less discussed and contested in academic circles. As a result, it was rather confusing when the Indonesian government intended to re-introduce Pancasila Education recently. This paper suggests that consistent and systematic use of such terms will enable us to locate Pancasila more proportionately in the “map” of Indonesia’s Citizenship Education (Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, PKn).
Keywords
Full Text:
DOWNLOAD FULL PAPERReferences
Bajunid, I. A. (2008). The building of a nation and ideas of nationhood: Citizenship education in Malaysia. In Citizenship curriculum in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 127–146). Springer.
Chamim, A. I. (2003). Civic education: Pendidikan kewarganegaraan menuju kehidupan yang demokratis dan berkeadaban. Yogyakarta: Majelis Pendidikan Tinggi Penelitian dan Pengembangan PP Muhammadiyah, LP3M UMY, dan The Asia Foundation.
Crick, B. (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools. Final report of the advisory group on citizenship. London. https://doi.org/10.1177/014473949901900204
Curaming, R. A., & Kalidjernih, F. K. (2011). Good intention gone bad? The politics of blame in the education discourses in indonesia. In R. A. Curaming & F. Dhount (Eds.), Yale International Indonesia Forum (4th) (pp. 113–134). Yogyakarta.
Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging knowledge: The university in the knowledge society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2002a). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi: Mata pelajaran kewarganegaraan (citizenship), sekolah dasar dan madrasah ibtidaiyah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2002b). kurikulum berbasis kompetensi: Mata pelajaran kewarganegaraan (citizenship), sekolah menengah atas dan madrasah aliyah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2002c). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi: mata pelajaran kewarganegaraan (citizenship), sekolah menengah pertama dan madrasah tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Department of Constitutional Affairs. (2007). The future of citizenship: A report for the department for constituional affairs. London: Henley Center Headlight Vision.
Foccault, M. (2005). The order of things. An acrchaelogy of human sciences. First Publication 1966, English Translation, 1970. London and New York: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118324905.ch3
Lee, W. O. (2008). Tensions and contentions in citizenship curriculum in Asia and the Pacific. In D. L. Grossman, W. O. Lee, & K. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Citizenship curriculum in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 215–231). Springer.
Meihui, L. (2004). A society in transition: The paradigm shift of civic education in Taiwan. In W. O. Lee, D. L. Grossman, K. J. Kennedy, & G. P. Fairbrother (Eds.), Citizenship Education in Asia and the Pacific: Concept and Issues (pp. 97–117). Hong Kong, China: Springer.
Pocock, J. G. A. (1992). The ideal of citizenship since classical times. Queen’s Quarterly, 99(1), 33.
Quigley, C. N., Buchanan-Jr, & Bahmueller, C. (1991). Civitas: A framework for civic education. ERIC.
Turner, B. (1999). Classical sociology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219485
Wetherell, M. (2001). Debates in discourse research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 380–399). London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v16i1.25311
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Freddy K Kalidjernih, Winarno W
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal indexed by:
Supported by:
Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan is published by Univesitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Indonesia Association Profession of Pancasila and Civic Education/Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (AP3KnI).
Jurnal Civics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.