Pengaruh Kepuasan Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Sekretariat DPRD Kota Singkawang

Agus Triyono; Kurnia Riyantini

doi:10.21831/informasi.v46i2.12156

Pengaruh Kepuasan Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Sekretariat DPRD Kota Singkawang

Agus Triyono, Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Kurnia Riyantini, Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/informasi.v46i2.12156

Abstract

In an effort to achieve a success, then the satisfaction of organizational communication is a very important factor, it ‘caused communication satisfaction is the result of a number of processes that are internal and external.Employees is one of the most important assets who participate in helping in the achievement effortof organizational goals that is realization of the vision and mission of the organization. Therefore, good cooperation between the organization and all employees are indispensable so that common goals can be realized. This research aims to find the influence of communication organizational satisfaction to employees performance in Secretariat Legislature Singkawang city. This research uses quantitative research, the method used in this research is survey method. In this research, researcher used a questionnaire as the data collection technique. Sample in this study is all civil servants in Secretariat Legislature Singkawang city numbered as many as 35 people. Data analysis techniques used in this study is simple linear regression analysis techniques. Based on the results of simple linear regression test, obtained constant values from the regression variable employees performance that is equal 26,603. While the regression coefficient of the variable communication organization satisfaction is positive that is equal 0,462. This means that the variable communication organization satisfaction have a positive influence on variable employees performance that is equal 0,462. Based on t-test result, obtained t value of 3,874, greater than the table value of 2,034. Therefore, it can be concluded that H0rejected. This mean that the amount of significant influence among the variables communication organization satisfaction to employees performance of 31,3% while the rest 68,7% influenced by other variable.

Keywords

Communication Organization, Communication Organization Satisfaction, Employees Performance.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, Z., & Hui, J. (2014). No TitleAbdullah, Z., & Hui, J. (2014). No Title. The Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Teacher’s Job Satisfaction in the Malaysian Primary Shcool, 2(2). The Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Teacher’s Job Satisfaction in the Malaysian Primary Shcool, 2(2).

Alsayed, A. K., Motaghi, M. H., & Osman, I. B. (2012). No Title. The Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Performance Indicators in Palestinian Governmental Organization, 2(11).

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

CH. (n.d.). Ya Allah.! Anggota DPRD Singkawang Belum Dapat Emblem. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://beritakalimantan.co/ya-allah-anggota-dprd-singkawang-belum-dapat-emblem/

Fahmi, I. (2013). Perilaku Organisasi Teori, Aplikasi, dan Kasus. (M. Djalil, Ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Jaupi, F., & Llaci, S. (2015). No Title. The Impact of Communication Satisfaction and Demographic Variables on Employee Engagement.

Kosasih, D. E., & Susanto, S. S. D. (2014). KOMUNIKASI ORGANISASI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN KINERJA PENGURUS GAPOKTAN PADA PROGRAM PENGUATAN LEMBAGA DISTRIBUSI PANGAN MASYARAKAT (Kasus Pada Gapoktan di Kabupaten Subang dan Kabupaten Bogor), 12(2).

Kriyantono, R. (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi (pertama). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Manopo, J. V. (2014). PERAN KOMUNIKASI ORGANISASI DALAM MEMBENTUK EFEKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN CV . MAGNUM SIGN AND PRINT ADVERTISING SAMARINDA, 2(3), 357–372.

Masmuh, A. (2008). Komunikasi Organisasi Dalam Perspektif Teori Dan Praktek. Malang: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Morissan. (2012). Metode Penelitian Survey (Pertama). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ogunjinmi, A. A., Ladebo, O. J., Onadeko, S. A., & Ogunjinmi, O. K. (2013). No Title. Demographic and Professional Factors as Predictors of Communication Satisfaction among Nigeria National Park’s Employees, 9.

Peraturan Walikota Singkawang Nomor 60 Tahun 2009 Tentang Uraian Tugas Pejabat Struktural Di Lingkungan Sekretariat DPRD Kota singkawang.

Rajhans, K. (2012). No Title. Effective Organizational Communication a Key to Employee Motivation and Performance, 2(2).

Rencana Strategis (RENSTRA) Sekretariat DPRD Kota Singkawang Tahun 2013-2017.

Ruliana, P. (2014). Komunikasi Organisasi Teori Dan Studi Kasus. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sanusi, A. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sari, T. D. M. (2012). PERAN KOMUNIKASI ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif Terhadap Peran Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan RT. Ortopedi Prof. Dr. R. Soeharso Surakarta).

Sholichah, M. (2012). Pengaruh iklim komunikasi organisasi terhadap kinerja pegawai (Survey pada Bagian Humas Pemerintah Provinsi DIY).

Siregar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dilengkapi Dengan Perbandingan Perhitungan Manual & SPSS. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dilengkapi Dengan Perbandingan Perhitungan Manual & SPSS (Pertama). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tri, W. Y., Asep, S., & dkk. (2015). KINERJA PENDIDIK IPDN JATINANGOR, 9(April 2015), 153–170.

Umam, K. (2010). Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: CV.Pustaka Setia.

Wayne Pace, R., & Faules, D. F. (2013). Komunikasi Organisasi Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan. (D. Mulyana, Ed.). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v46i2.12156