Email this article 
Model pembelajaran blended partisipatif kemitraan sekolah dan orangtua
Yi Ying Chang, National Chiayi University, Taiwan, Province of China
Unik Ambar Wati, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Partisipasi orangtua dalam menyusun program kemitraan dengan sekolah masih belum optimal, sehingga seringkali orangtua hanya menjadi objek dalam program pendidikan di sekolah. Untuk mengatasi hal ini, dilakukan penelitian untuk mengembangkan model pembelajaran blended partisipatif kemitraan sekolah dan orangtua siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian pengembangan dengan model ADDIE, dan teknik pengumpulan data meliputi observasi, wawancara, dan angket. Analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terciptanya model pembelajaran blended partisipatif kemitraan sekolah dan orangtua siswa dengan tahapan (1) Analisis, meliputi analisis kebutuhan dan situasi, analisis tujuan umum dan materi, analisis karakteristik orangtua siswa, analisis lingkungan/perangkat teknologi, dan analisis waktu pembelajaran blended. (2) Desain dengan dua mode yaitu face to face (synchronous) dan online (asynchronous). (3) Pengembangan yaitu mengembangkan tujuan dan materi pembelajaran, merancang strategi pembelajaran blended, mengembangkan learning resource dan validasi ahli. (4) Implementasi pembelajaran blended meliputi tahap uji coba satu-satu dan uji lapangan terbatas. (5) Evaluasi meliputi pengembangan evaluasi formatif dan sumatif serta revisi model. Model ini dinilai layak oleh ahli, yang dinyatakan layak dengan skor 3.58, dan praktis untuk digunakan dengan skor 3,65. Penilaian ahli materi kemitraan sekolah dan orangtua yaitu 3,76 (layak), sementara penilaian ahli pembelajaran terhadap desain model pembelajaran blended dengan skor 3.76 (layak). Implikasi dari hasil kelayakan dan kepraktisan model ini dapat digunakan dalam lingkup yang lebih luas.
Blended participatory learning model with school-parent partnership for student
Parents' participation in compiling and developing partnership programs is still not optimal; parents tend to become objects in educational programs at schools This research aimed to develop a participatory blended learning model for school partnerships and parents. The research method used was development research with the ADDIE model. Data collection techniques at the model development stage used observation, interviews, and questionnaires, additionally, for data analysis using descriptive analysis. The results of the study have compiled a participatory blended learning model for school partnerships and parents of students with stages (1) Analysis which includes analysis of needs and situations, analysis of general objectives and materials, analysis of parents' characteristics, analysis of the environment/technological devices, and analysis of blended learning time. (2) Design with two modes, namely face-to-face (synchronous) and online (asynchronous). (3) Development by developing learning objectives and materials, designing blended learning strategies, developing learning resources, and expert validation. (4) Implementing blended learning includes one-on-one trials and limited field trials. (5) Evaluation includes the development of formative and summative evaluations and model revisions. Expert validation on the participatory blended learning model was generally stated to be feasible with a score of 3.58 (decent). The expert's assessment of school partnerships and parents was 3.76 (appropriate), while the learning expert's assessment of the blended learning model design scored 3.76 (decent). Ultimately, the results of the practicality test obtained a score of 3.65 (practical). The implications of the results of the feasibility and practicality of this model can be used in a wider scope
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2019). The connection between perceived constructivist learning environments and faculty uncivil authoritarian behaviors. Higher Education, 77(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0281-y
Badri, M., Al Qubaisi, A., Al Rashedi, A., & Yang, G. (2014). The causal relationship between parental involvement and children’s behavioural adjustment to KG-1 schooling. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 8(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40723-014-0003-6
Chen, J. J., & Rivera-Vernazza, D. E. (2022). Communicating digitally: Building preschool teacher-parent partnerships via digital technologies during COVID-19. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01366-7
Cholik, M., Samani, M., Buditjahjanto, I. G. P. A., & Putri, A. R. (2021). The effect of education system components on the quality of vocational high school graduates. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14314a
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Degeng, I. N. (2013). Ilmu pembelajaran: Klasifikasi variabel untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Arasmedia.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2011). Strategies and models for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills. Pearson.
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1465669
Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2016). Necessary but not sufficient: The role of policy for advancing programs of school, family, and community partnerships. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.10
Finn, R. (2019). Specifying the contributions of parents as pedagogues: Insights for parent–school partnerships. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(5), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00318-2
Frederico, M., & Whiteside, M. (2016). Building school, family, and community partnerships: Developing a theoretical framework. Australian Social Work, 69(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1042488
Garcia-Reid, P., Peterson, C. H., & Reid, R. J. (2015). Parent and teacher support among Latino immigrant youth. Education and Urban Society, 47(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513495278
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
Gross, D., Bettencourt, A. F., Taylor, K., Francis, L., Bower, K., & Singleton, D. L. (2020). What is parent engagement in early learning? Depends who you ask. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(3), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01680-6
Hardika, H., Aisyah, E. N., Raharjo, K. M., & Aptiningsih, D. (2020). Pembelajaran transformatif: Model pembelajaran yang memberdayakan. UNM.
Haron, H., Natrah Aziz, N. H., & Harun, A. (2017). A conceptual model participatory engagement within e-learning community. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.046
Hu, B. Y., Alexander, C. R., Wu, H., Roberts, S. K., & Li, Y. (2021). Exploring home-school partnership and Chinese parental satisfaction of preschool services: The moderating effect of childrearing beliefs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(1), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01862-7
Ibrahim, M. M., & Nat, M. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2
Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2014). Models of teaching. Pearson.
Kim, J.-R., Jeong, B.-G., Park, K.-S., & Kang, Y.-S. (2011). Applications of the participatory learning process in health promotion. Journal of Agricultural Medicine and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2011.36.2.130
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcome. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Lalima, L., & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
Mereoiu, M., Abercrombie, S., & Murray, M. (2016). One step closer: Connecting parents and teachers for improved student outcomes. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1243079. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1243079
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Munro, V., Morello, A., Oster, C., Redmond, C., Vnuk, A., Lennon, S., & Lawn, S. (2018). E-learning for self-management support: Introducing blended learning for graduate students – a cohort study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1328-6
Ordu, U. B.-A. (2021). The role of teaching and learning aids/methods in a changing world. New Challenges to Education: Lessons from Around the World: Part 5- Law and Educatio, 210–216.
Philominraj, A., Bertilla, M., & Ranjan, R. (2020). Participatory learning: An appealing classroom method to Foster English Language Teaching (Aprendizaje participativo: Un método atractivo de aula para fomentar la enseñanza del idioma inglés). Revista Espacios, 41(06). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n06/a20v41n06p10.pdf
Prawiradilaga, D. S. (2014). Wawasan teknologi pendidikan. Kencana media group.
Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
Schroeder, S., Murray-Everett, N. C., Gates, J., & Shear, S. B. (2021). Informing, transforming, inquiring: Approaches to elementary social studies in methods course syllabi. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.07.001
Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Mims, C., & Russell, J. D. (2021). Instructional technology and media for learning (12th ed.). Pearson.
Suarman, S., Hendripides, H., & Hikmah, N. (2018). Development of innovative teaching materials through scientific approach. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.2.2.p.14-22
Sudijono, A. (2016). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sugrah, N. (2019). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 19(2).
Sumantri, M. S. (2015). Strategi pembelajaran: teori praktik di tingkat pendidikan dasar. Rajawali Pers.
Suparman, A. (2014). Desain instruksional modern: Panduan para pengajar dan inovator pendidikan. Erlangga.
Westerlaken, M., Christiaans-Dingelhoff, I., Filius, R. M., de Vries, B., de Bruijne, M., & van Dam, M. (2019). Blended learning for postgraduates; An interactive experience. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1717-5
Winarni, R. S., Rasiban, L. M., & Juangsih, J. (2022). The effect of YouTube video learning media on the students’ basic Japanese listening ability. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022) (pp. 455–459). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_71
Wittmann, G.-E., & Olivier, J. (2021). Blended learning as an approach to foster self-directed learning in teacher professional development programmes. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learnin, 16(2). https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-jitl1-v16-n2-a7
Zenda, R. (2021). Implementing a parental involvement policy to enhance Physical Sciences learner’s academic achievement in rural secondary schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09271-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v16i1.54619
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Supervised by:
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan has been indexed by:
