COMPROMISING BETWEEN THE GENERAL AND SPECIFIC IN EAP SYLLABUS DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIAN CONTEXT

Jamilah Jamilah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/diksi.v26i1.25444

Abstract


Abstract

(Title: Compromising Between the General and Specific in EAP Syllabus Development in Indonesian Context). The quality of a language program is reflected in the syllabus used from which the aim, contents and belief about language instruction are revealed. Syllabuses for English for Academic Purposes in Indonesian universities have been developed, yet they are not quite satisfactory. This article is to explain how to develop a sound syllabus for EAP in Indonesian context, following the steps: context and needs analysis and syllabus planning. Data were collected through triangulated survey employing questionnaires, observation, document study and discussion. Research participants were students, English teachers, and management staff of Yogyakarta State University. Integrated, theme-based syllabus is proposed that includes study skills in higher education as the general theme, which is completed with specific themes related to students’ disciplines. This way enables both general and specific skills of EAP to be included in a single syllabus.

 

Keyword: syllabus, language program, English for academic purposes, instruction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aini, C. H. (2008). Rancangan Silabus Mata Kuliah Bahasa Inggris Semester Pertama: Sebuah Studi Kasus di Jurusan Budidaya Pertanian Universitas Malikussaleh. Thesis. Pascasarjan Universitas Indonesia jakarta

Allan, B. (2010). Study Skills Handbook. Hull: Hull University Business School.

Anderson, N. J. (2012). Reading Instruction, in Burns & Richards (eds): The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brick, J. (2012).Teaching English for Academic Purposes, in Burns & Richards (eds): The Cambridge Guide to Ped- agogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brinton, S., Wesche. (1989). Content-Based Language Instruction. New York: Newbury House

Brown. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teach- ing. New York: Longman

Crandall, J. (2012). Content-based Instruction and Content Language Integrated Learning, in Burns & Richards (eds). The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, S. (2003). Content Based Instruction in EFL Contexts, The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. IX, No. 2, February 2003. http://iteslj.org./downloaded on 9 October 2013 at 10.12

El-Furqaan, Z. 2014. Blended Language Learning untuk Optimalisasi Pembe¬la-jaran Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Perguruan Tinggi di Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Indonesia: Jakarta

Grabe & Stoller, (2001). Teaching and Researching Reading, 2nd edition, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes, an Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2008). Understanding Language Teaching, from Method to Postmethod. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Little, D. (2000). Learner Autonomy: Why Foreign Language should Occupy a Central Role in the Curriculum in S. Green (ed). New Perspective on Teaching and Learning Modern Languages pp. 24-45. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.

Mustadi, A. 2011. Pengembangan Competency-task Based dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Calon Guru SD. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Nation, I.S.P. & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Development. New York/London: Routledge.

Nation, I. S. P. (2012). What should Every ESL Teacher Know? Compass Publishing.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies, What Every Teacher Should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Snow, M.A. (2001). Content-based and Immersion Models for Second and Foreign Language Teaching, in Celce- Murcia (ed): Teaching English as a Second /Foreign Language. New York: Heinle & Heinle Thomson Learning

Solikhah, I. (2014). Silabus EAP Berbasis Learning Outcomes untuk Mahasiswa Jurusan Non-Bahasa Inggris di IAIN Surakarta. Pedagogik, Vol.8, no 1.

Stoller, F.L. & Grabe, W. (1997). The 6 T’s Approach to Content-based Instruction. Longman.http://www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/curriculum/stoller_grabe1997downloaded on 30 November 2013 at 3.19 .

Wingate, U. 2006. Doing Away with Study Skills, in Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 457-469

Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner Autonomy and How can it be Fostered, The internet TESL Journal, vol. VI No. 11 http://iteslj.org/Articles




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v26i1.25444

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Diksi



 

Jurnal Diksi is published by Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/diksi

 

Our Journal has been Indexed by:

  

  

   

Diksi Journal is published by the Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Himpunan Sarjana Kesusasteraan Indonesia (HISKI)

Supervised by:


 
Translator
 
View My Stats