STUDY OF VOCATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PERFORMANCE IN PREPARATION FOR SCHOOL SELF-EVALUATION IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ERA

Zainal Arifin, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Syukri Fathudin Achmad Widodo, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Giri Wiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Agus Sutikno, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Darmono Darmono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This research is based on the results of initial observations and field observations, such as: (1) the quality of SMK graduates is still low, especially with the current world problem, namely the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) there are still some educational quality standards that need to be improved and even improved their achievements. (3) many vocational high schools have implemented a school quality assurance system, but why is the quality of their graduates still low. The purpose of this study is to determine the assessment of school principals, teachers, school committees, and vocational students to photograph the efforts made by vocational quality assurance, especially in preparing the School Self Evaluation (SSE) as the main capital in the accreditation activities of the school concerned.

The research method used is the descriptive quantitative research method. The research population is Vocational High School, while the sample is taking 4 Vocational High Schools that have implemented a Quality Assurance System, especially QMS ISO 9001:2008 or QMS ISO 9001:2015, such as several Vocational High Schools located in the Province of D.I. Yogyakarta and Central Java. Research data were collected based on the results of the distribution of questionnaires (instruments), interviews, observations, documentation studies, and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). The filler of the research instrument is the principals, teachers, school committees, and the concerned vocational students. The research data were analyzed descriptively quantitatively to see how far the level of achievement of the eight National Education Standards (NES) that had been set in the RPS.

The results of this study are: (1) schools in implementing a school quality assurance system through their SSE have used four stages, consist of standard-setting, standard fulfillment, continuous evaluation, and quality improvement. (2) schools have taken correct and appropriate steps in achieving their vision and mission based on the formulated SPMI guidelines, (3) schools have implemented eight NESs starting from standards: graduates, content, process, educational assessment, educators and education personnel, educational facilities and infrastructure, education management, and financing standards properly. (4) each vocational high school has the same or different strategies and methods in achieving the school's vision and mission.

Keywords


Performance, Quality assurance, School self-evaluation

Full Text:

94-108 (PDF)

References


Ahmad Tanzeh dan Suyitno. (2006), Dasar-Dasar Penelitian. Surabaya: Lembaga Kajian Agama dan Filsafat (eLKAF).

Ahmad Tanzeh. (2009). Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Ali, Moh., (2000). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu dalam Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan", Jurnal Mimbar Pendidikan. No.1 Tahun XIX, hal. 28-31.

Bass, M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership Theory, Research, & Managerial Applications. Fourth Edition. New York: Free Press.

Burhan Bungin. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Kebijakan Publik Serta Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2003). School Leadership: Concept and Evidence. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

Bush, T. (2010). Leadership and management development in education. London: Sage Publication, Ltd.

Cunningham , W.G., & Cordeiro, P.A. (2009). Educational leadership a bridge to improved practice. New York: Pearson.

Donald Ary, et. all. (2005). Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan, Terjemahan: Arief Furchan, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fattah, Nanang. (2003). Landasan Kependidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rodaskarya.

Gempur Santoso. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Gulo, W. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: Grasindo.

Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2008). Instructional Leadership in Three Australian Schools.

Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Organisational Learning and Leadership, The University of Melbourne.

Hallinger, P. (2003). “Leading Educational Change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership”, dalam Cambridge Journal of Education Vol. 33, No. 3, November, p. 35-70.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2003). Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan sistem. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Hammond, L. D., Meyerson D., LaPointe, M., & Orr, T. M. (2010). Preparing Principals for Changing World Lesson from Effective School Leadership Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hasibuan, Malayu SP. (2003). Organisasi dan Motivasi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Herman, J.L, dan Herman, J.J, (1995). Total Quality Management (TQM) for Education” (Jurnal of Educational Tecnology).

Hoy. W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (2013). Educational administration: theory, practive, and research. 9th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Huber, G. S. (2010). School Leadership International Perspective. London: Springer.

Husaini Usman. (2013). Manajemen: Teori, praktik, dan riset pendidikan. Edisi 4. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. https://www.kompasiana.com/ariasdi/552934f1f17e61264c8b45ec/sekolah-perlumengevaluasi-diri

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional (2010). Permendiknas Nomor 63 Tahun 2009 tentang Sitem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

Khoiri, Muhammad (2010). Makalah Seminar Nasional VI SDM Teknologi Nuklir Yogyakarta, 18 November 2010 - ISSN 1978-0176. Yogyakarta: STTNBATAN & Fak. Saintek UIN Sunan Kalidjaga.

Koentjoroningrat. (1980). Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Leitwood, K., Louis, K.S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Learning from leadership project review of research how leadership influences student learning. Minnosita: Carey, OISE, dan The Wallace Foun-dation.

Levin, B. (2012). How to change 5000 schools a practical and positive approach for Leadingchange at every level. Third Printing. Cambrid-ge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2002). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lichman, M. (2010). Qualitative Research in Education A User’s Guide. Edition 2. London: Sage Publication, Ltd.

Lunenburg, F.C., & Orstein, A.C. (2000). Educational administration concepts and practices. Third Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Luthans, Fred. (2008). Organizational Behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Makhfud, Muhammad. (2010). Kompetensi Manajerial Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri 1 Purwosari Pasuruan. Tesis. Malang: Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Malang.

McMillan, J.H. (2013). Educational research fundamedntals for the consu-mer. Sixth Edition. New York: Pearson.

Meirawan, Danny (2010). Penjaminan Mutu Satuan Pendidikan sebagai Upaya Pengendalian Mutu Pendidikan Secara Nasional dalam Otonomi Daerah. Makalah Konaspi VI UPI Bandung.

Muhammad Nisfiannoor. (2009). Pendekatan Statistik Modern Untuk Ilmu Sosial Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Mulyasa, E. (2008). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. (2009) Metode penelitian Pendidikan. (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, S. (2009). Metode Research: Penelitian Ilmiah, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,

Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: CV. Eko Jaya.

Riduwan. (2006). Metode Dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

_______. (2009). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula, Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Risnawati. (2009). Hubungan Kompetensi Pedagogik dan Profesional dengan Kinerja Guru PAI pada SMP se-Kota Palangka Raya. Tesis. Tidak Dipublikasikan. Banjarmasin: IAIN Antasari.

Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2007). Perilaku Organisasi. Alih Bahasa oleh Diana Angelina. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sagala, Saiful. (2006). Kemampuan Profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sallis, Edward (2008). Total Quality Management in Education. Alih Bahasa: Ahmad

Ali Riyadi & Fahrurrozi. Cetakan VIII. Jogyakarta: Penerbit IRCiSoD.

Santoso, Kurniawan Adi. 02 September 2013. Guru, Jagalah Profesionlismemu. Malang Post, hlm 1.

Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teacher and developing school leaders for the 21 st century lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Slamet, PH. (2012). Hand Out Perkuliahan Quality Assurance in Education pada Program Pasca Sarjana Konsentrasi Manajemen Kepengawasan Pendidikan di MM UGM Yogyakarta Angkatan ke-02.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2005). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sunarno, Agus. (2005). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Kepemimpinan, Kepala Sekolah, dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru. Tesis. Surakarta: Program Pasca-sarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2002). Membenahi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Toha, Muhammad. (2010). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Motivasi Kerja Guru, dan Iklim Sekolah terhadap Semangat Kerja Guru SMK Negeri di Kabupaten Banjar. Tesis. Tidak Dipublikasikan. Banjarmasin: PPs IAIN Antasari, 2010), h. 270-271

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

Usman, M. Uzer. (2010). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Yamin, M. (2007). Profesionalisme Guru & Implementasi KTSP. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.

Zaini (2010). Perbandingan Kinerja antara Guru PAI Yang Belum Menerima Tunjangan Sertifikasi dan Guru PAI yang Sudah Menerima Tunjangan Sertifikasi pada Sekolah Menengah Umum (SMU) se-Kota Palangka Raya. Tesis. Tidak Dipublikasikan. Banjarmasin: IAIN Antasari.

Zuliati, Fitria. (2009). Studi Komparasi antara guru yang Telah Mengikuti Sertifikasi dan yang Belum terhadap Kompetensi Profesional di Wilayah Kecamatan Gedeg Kabupaten Mojokerto. Skripsi. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/dinamika.v9i1.73776

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons 

Jurnal Dinamika Vokasional Teknik Mesin by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/dynamika was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


 

 

 

in collaboration with:

 

 

View My Stats