Navigating Rhetoric in Academic Writing: Key Structures in Effective Dissertation

Anis Firdatul Rochma,
Endang Nurhayati,
Pratomo Widodo,
Anita Triastuti,
Tadkiroatun Musfiroh,

Abstract


A dissertation represents a key academic work produced by doctoral students as a requirement for graduation and the attainment of a doctoral degree. Consequently, doctoral candidates are expected to demonstrate strong and precise dissertation writing skills. This study aims to (1) analyze the rhetorical structures employed in each section of dissertations authored by doctoral students in the Doctoral Program in Language Education, and (2) compare these rhetorical structures with established academic writing conventions. The research utilizes a mixed-methods approach, adopting the textual organization framework of the Academic Phrasebank by Morley (2014) as the primary guide, supplemented by Santos’ (1996) framework for abstract structure. Data collection includes both qualitative and quantitative components. The data analysis is conducted using AntConc 4.0.11, developed by Laurence Anthony from Waseda University, with an emphasis on calculating the frequency of words, phrases, collocations, concordances, and specific expressions within the dissertations. The findings reveal distinctive rhetorical patterns in the abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion sections of the dissertations produced by doctoral students within the field of Language Education.

Keywords


dissertation;rhetorical pattern;doctoral program;language education

Full Text:

Untitled

References


Ahlstrom, D. (2017). How to publish in academic journals: Writing a strong introduction section. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 755-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12292

Ardriyati, W., & Widyaningrum, R. (2015). The importance of writing the method section in a research paper. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 7(2), 45-57.

Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., & Basthomi, Y. (2020). Rhetorical patterns of discussion sections in research articles written by Indonesian authors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.12.001

Bavdekar, S. B. (2015). Writing the introduction and discussion sections: Essential parts of a research manuscript. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 61(4), 273-275. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.166515

Berkenttor, J., & Huckin, T. (1995). Technical writing and professional communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bolinger, D. (1976). Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum, 1(1), 1-14.

Coxhead, A., & Byrd, P. (2007). Academic word list. Victoria University of Wellington.

Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to research methods: A practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project. How to Books.

Fahnestock, J. (2011). Rhetorical style: The uses of language in persuasion. Oxford University Press.

Farnia, M., & Barati, N. (2017). A comparative study of introduction sections of research articles written by native and non-native authors in applied linguistics. Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 61-77.

Greenhalgh, T., Taylor, R., & Macfarlane, F. (2004). Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews). BMJ, 309(6951), 89-91. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6951.89

Hai-lin, H., & Huan, W. (2010). An analysis of abstract structures in L2 academic writing. Asian ESP Journal, 6(1), 16-32.

Holtom, D., & Fisher, W. (1999). Enjoy writing your science thesis or dissertation! A step by step guide to planning and writing dissertations and theses for undergraduate and graduate science students. Imperial College Press.

Jahangard, A., Heidari, M., & Khany, R. (2014). Genre analysis of conclusion sections of research papers in applied linguistics. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 2(2), 74-83.

Kallet, R. H. (2004). How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respiratory Care, 49(10), 1229-1232. https://doi.org/10.4187/1066-1246

Kendal, J. (2015). The role of literature review in placing a research study within a broader context. Journal of Writing Research, 7(1), 36-55.

Kosasih, F. (2017). Methodological considerations in applied linguistics research. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 53-67.

Levin, S. (1966). The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present. Harvard University Press.

Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.721

Morley, J. (2014). Academic phrasebank. University of Manchester.

Parker, R., & Riley, K. (1995). Linguistic and rhetorical patterns in ESL writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90002-0

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-225). London: Longman.

Qasim, A., Sarvat, S., & Naz, S. (2021). A comparative study of research abstracts written by ESL, EFL, and L1 researchers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(5), 410-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1812859

Saidi, M., & Talebi, H. (2021). The genre of research abstracts: A study of rhetorical patterns in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.101031

Santos, M. B. D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk, 16(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481

Shehzad, W. (2006). Raising a critical voice in the introduction section of research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.06.003

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Ward, S., House, J., & Hamer, M. (2009). Critical literature reviews: A case for structured reading. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(6), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987109107516




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v8i2.78319

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN: 2580-5525 || e-ISSN: 2580-5533

Indexed by:

          


Flag Counter

View My StatsCreative Commons License

Jurnal Kependidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Journal Stats