Multirepresentation in Physics Learning Research: A Content Analysis Review of Trends, Opportunities, and Challenges

O Ate, Master of Physics Education Program, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
P. Parno, Master of Physics Education Program, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
N Munfaridah, Master of Physics Education Program, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

Abstract


The study aimed to present the trends, opportunities, and challenges of using multiple representation in physics learning from Junior High School to Higher Education. Through the Content Analysis method, this study analyzed 45 journals that examined of using multiple representation in physics learning obtained using Publish or Perish with Google Scholar and Scopus databases from 2019-2023. The results showed that the number of publications of using multiple representation has increased. The most widely used research type was quantitative. High school students and materials (waves and motion) were the target research subjects and popular materials. Learning physics using multiple representations has the opportunity to facilitate students' concept understanding, problem solving ability, and representation ability. The challenges faced in its use are teachers' difficulties in organizing representations in a structured and coherent manner, as well as students' difficulties in representing physics concepts in graphics and equations. In relation to these findings, it is suggested that future researchers adopt qualitative research and increase the diversity of physics subjects and topics. Also, the abilities measured, such as students' thinking and cognitive explore multiple representation in physics learning. Future research could explore the potential of digital technology and qualitative approaches to use multiple representation to enrich the quality of physics education.

Keywords


Multirepresentation and Physics learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C. A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementating Multiple Representation-Based Worksheet to Develop Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10271a.

Ady, W. N. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMA terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika pada Materi Gerak Lurus Beraturan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Fisika, 2(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v2i1.1599.

Aha, L. H., Muhardjito, M., & Sunaryono, S. (2020). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Multirepresentasi dengan Pendekatan Conceptual Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Kemampuan Representasi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i1.13128.

Aina, Q., Suyana, I., & Hidayat, A. (2020). Desain Pembelajaran untuk Menyelidiki Pengaruh Representational Activity Tasks terhadap Kemampuan Koherensi Representasi pada Materi Ayunan Bandul Sederhana. Diffraction, 2(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v2i2.1996

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The Functions of Multiple Representations. Computers & Education, 33(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.

Ainsworth, S., & Th Loizou, A. (2003). The Effects of Self-Explaining When Learning with Text or Diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00033-8.

AM, M. A., & Istiyono, E. (2022). Multiple Representation Ability of High School Students in Physics: A Study of Modern Response Theory. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 5(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v5i1.12550.

Annisa, B. L., Miriam, S., & Suyidno, S. (2022). The Effectiveness of A Multiple Representation-Based Flipbook to Improve Students’ Problem-Solving Ability on The Topic of Wave. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 8(2), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i2.3796.

Aryanti, Y., & Widodo, E. (2020). The Effectiveness of Student Team Achiement Divisions (STAD) Cooperative Learning In Science Learning On Analysis Skills and Social Skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v4i1.34237.

Baddeley, A. (1992). Working Memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359.

Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education. In Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education (Issue January 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3.

Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono, & Leasa, M. (2020). Students’ Mental Models of Solid Elasticity: Mixed Method Study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.21.

Bollen, L., De Cock, M., Zuza, K., Guisasola, J., & Van Kampen, P. (2016). Generalizing a Categorization of Students’ Interpretations of Linear Kinematics Graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010108.

Bollen, L., Kampen, P. Van, Baily, C., Kelly, M., & Cock, M. De. (2017). Student Difficulties Regarding Symbolic and Graphical Representations of Vector Fields. 020109, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109.

Busyairi, A., Sutrio, S., Gunada, I. W., Harjono, A., Doyan, A., & Munandar, R. (2021). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Calon Guru Fisika melalui Pendekatan Multipel Representasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(3), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i3.229.

ÇERMİK, H. (2020). From the Perspectives of High School Students: Difficulties in the Process of L. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 5(9), 793–822. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoecc.144.

Citra, C., Distrik, I. W., & Herlina, K. (2020). The Practicality and Effectiveness of Multiple Representations Based Teaching Material to Improve Student’s Self-Efficacy and Ability of Physics Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012029.

Davis, E. A. (2006). Challenges New Science Teachers Face. 76(4), 607–651.

Flor, L. S., Reitsma, M. B., Gupta, V., Ng, M., & Gakidou, E. (2021). The Effects of Tobacco Control Policies on Global Smoking Prevalence. Nature Medicine, 27(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01210-8.

Fredlund, T., Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2015). Enhancing the Possibilities for Learning: Variation of Disciplinary-Relevant Aspects in Physics Representations. European Journal of Physics, 36(5), 55001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/5/055001.

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Introduction: Macro, Submicro and Symbolic Representations and the Relationship Between Them: Key Models in Chemical Education. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_1.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.

Harti, N. D. (2022). Pengembangan Materi Ajar Fisika Berbasis Multirepresentasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Analisis Peserta Didik di MAN 2 Makassar. Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(7), 719–730. https://jurnal.arkainstitute.co.id/index.php.

Hung, C. Y., Xu, W. W., & Lin, Y. R. (2022). Retraction Notice to Multi-Touch, Gesture-Based Simulations: Impacts on Learning Optical Imaging and Mental Model Development. Computers and Education, 188(June), 104575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104575.

Indah, I. A. A., Supeno, & Wahyuni, D. (2022). Pengaruh Model Problem-Based Learning Disertai LKPD Berbasis Multirepresentasi pada Pembelajaran IPA Terhadap Scientific Reasoning Skills Siswa Smp. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v12i2.226.

Janah, A. F., Mindyarto, B. N., & Ellianawati. (2020). Pengembangan Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Multirepresentasi Siswa pada Materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online (JPFT), 8(3), 58–69.

Jannah, R., Taufiq, M., & Rahma, R. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan Pendekatan STEAM pada Materi Fluida Statis terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Jangka. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 3(2), 73–77. http://www.journal.umuslim.ac.id/index.php/jemas/article/view/1369.

Johnston, M. P. (2014). Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (2nd ed.) by Alexander W. Astin and Anthony Lising Antonio (review). Journal of College Student Development, 55(4), 427–429. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0033.

Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118.

Klein, P., Viiri, J., & Kuhn, J. (2019). Visual Cues Improve Students’ Understanding of Divergence and Curl: Evidence from Eye Movements During Reading and Problem Solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 10126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010126.

Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of Multipe Representation use by Experts and Novices During Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111.

Krisnaningsih, E., & Hariyono, E. (2022). Implementation of Multi-representation Learning on Climate Change Integrated Dynamic Fluid to Improve Student’s Problem-Solving Skills. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i1.12465.

Kurniasari, L. Y., & Wasis, W. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Multi Representasi dan Kaitannya dengan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i2.2404.

Lincoln, Y. S., Shavelson, R. J., Towne, L., Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (2004). Scientific Research in Education. In Academe (Vol. 90, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.2307/40252717.

Mardatila, A., Novia, H., & Sinaga, P. (2019). Penerapan Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Multi Representasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Pokok Bahasan Gerak Parabola. Omega: Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.31758/omegajphysphyseduc.v5i2.33.

Mellu, R. N. K., & Langtang, D. (2023). Profil Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Kinematika Gerak dan Fluida Statis. 11(2), 170–184.

Munawaroh, A., Wilujeng, I., & Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). Physics Learning Instruction Based on the Conceptual Change Model for Senior High Schools. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.063.

Munfaridah, N., & Goedhart, M. (2022). Multiple Representations (MR) Based Instructional Approach in Support of Physics Identity and Physics Teachers’ Identity Development: Design Considerations. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.6982.

Musyarrof, A. F., Nugroho, S. E., & Masturi, M. (2018). The Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Weakness in Senior High School on Physics Learning. 3, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2991/iset-18.2018.8.

Muzdalifah, W., Irianti, M., & Maimurni, M. (2019). Applying Multirepresentation Based Physics Learning to Improve the Ability of Representation of Students in Class X MIPA 2 SMA Babussalam Pekanbaru. Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.2.67-74.

Ngo, V. T. (2022). Enhancing Problem-Solving Competencies for Engineering Students Using Flipped Classroom: A Case Study in a College Physics Course in Vietnam. Multicultural Education, 8(12), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7405316.

Nikat, R. F., Loupatty, M., & Zahroh, S. H. (2021). Kajian Pendekatan Multirepresentasi dalam Konteks Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Fisika, 1(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v1i2.1449.

Nisa, W. M., & Tyas, R. A. (2022). Does an Android-Based Interactive Flipbook Affect the Student’s Science Concept Mastery? Journal of Science Education Research, 6(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v6i2.50801.

Nurussofi, I., Mahardika, I. K., & Budiarso, A. S. (2022). Impact of the Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model with Multi-Representation Based Worksheet on Students’ Critical Thinking. Journal of Science and Science Education, 3(2), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v3i2.1804.

Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics and Science Education – Why Should We Use Them? 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1.

Punch, K. F. (2013). Theory anda Method in Social Science Research. London New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Putri, A. H., Sutrisno, S., & Chandra, D. T. (2020). Efektivitas Pendekatan Multirepresentasi dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA pada Materi Gaya dan Gerak. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i2.9400

Rahayu, N. T., Fatmaryanti, S. D., & Pratiwi, U. (2021). Perancangan Alat Peraga Tumbukan Menggunakan Sensor Ultrasonik HC-SR04 Berbasis Multirepresentasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains (JIPS), 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37729/jips.v2i1.590.

Rahmawati, D., & Setyarsih, W. (2021). Kajian Literatur Pembelajaran Multirepresentasi pada Materi Fisika Tingkat SMA. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v10n2.p1-10.

Rahmawati, R., Syamsuddin, A., Marisda, D. H., & ... (2021). Kajian Konseptual Multirepresentasi pada Materi Perkuliahan Kelistrikan. Seminar Nasional …, 40–53. http://103.76.50.195/semnaspendipa/article/view/26215.

Redish, E. F., Scherr, R. E., & Tuminaro, J. (2006). Reverse-Engineering the Solution of a “Simple” Physics Problem: Why Learning Physics Is Harder Than It Looks. The Physics Teacher, 44(5), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2195401.

Retno Safitri, K., Jatmiko, B., & Sudibyo, E. (2020). Keefektifan Perangkat Pembelajaran Investigation Based Multi Representation untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.94.

Rukhmana, T. (2021). Jurnal Edu Research Indonesian Institute for Corporate Learning And Studies (IICLS) Page 25. Jurnal Edu Research : Indonesian Institute For Corporate Learning And Studies (IICLS), 2(2), 28–33.

Sapto, S. H., & Sinaga, P. (2022). Strategi Representasi Eksternal dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Kognitif Materi Hukum Newton Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara, 119–130. https://ejournal.tahtamedia.com/index.php.

Scheiter, K., Brucker, B., & Ainsworth, S. (2020). Now Move Like that Fish: Can Enactment Help Learners Come to Understand Dynamic Motion Presented in Photographs and Videos? Computers and Education, 155(July 2019), 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103934.

Silaen, S. S., Sudjito, D. N., & Sudarmi, M. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Multi Representasi Eksternal (MRE) untuk Mengetahui Profil Kemampuan Representasi Konsep. Publikasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v9i2.8477.

Siswanto, J. (2019). Implementasi Model IBMR Berbantu PhET Simulation untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v10i2.4437.

Susetyarini, E., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Trend of Critical Thinking Skill Researches in Biology Education Journals Across Indonesia: from Research Design to Data Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 535–550.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v9i1.72954

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jser/index

Accepted and published papers will be freely accessed in this website and the following abstracting & indexing databases:


   


 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.