Email this article The effectiveness of developing CLIL-based Indonesian language course teaching materials at Bengkulu city universities
Sudarwan Danim, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Didi Yulistio, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Ria Ariesta, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Abdul Muktadir, Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Meiselina Irmayanti, Universitas Bengkulu;National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, Province of China
Abstract
The development of learning materials for Indonesian courses uses a qualitative and quantitative approach to research and development (R & D). This study aims to produce teaching materials for Indonesian language courses based on CLIL that follow the learning needs of college students in Bengkulu City. The research subjects were all students who took Indonesian language courses consisting of Bengkulu University, Bengkulu Muhammadiyah University, and Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu State Islamic University. The effectiveness test of the development of teaching materials for Indonesian language courses based on CLIL in universities obtained a significant value. The average value of the results before the use of CLIL-based Indonesian language teaching materials in Bengkulu City universities which was developed was 68.50, and a standard deviation of 13,489 and after using CLIL-based Indonesian teaching materials in universities Bengkulu City which has been developed is 80.19 with a standard deviation of 11,546. This means the average difference in student learning outcomes before and after using the development of teaching materials for Indonesian language courses based on CLIL at Bengkulu City Universities.
Keywords: teaching materials, Indonesian, CLIL
Efektivitas pengembangan bahan ajar bahasa Indonesia berbasis CLIL di perguruan tinggi kota Bengkulu
Abstract
Pengembangan bahan ajar mata kuliah Bahasa Indonesia ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian dan pengembangan (R & D) dengan metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan bahan ajar mata kuliah bahasa Indonesia berbasis CLIL yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan belajar mahasiswa perguruan tinggi di Kota Bengkulu. Subjek penelitian adalah seluruh mahasiswa yang mengambil mata kuliah bahasa Indonesia yang terdiri dari Universitas Bengkulu, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, dan Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu. Uji efektivitas pengembangan bahan ajar mata kuliah bahasa Indonesia berbasis CLIL di perguruan tinggi memperoleh nilai yang signifikan. Nilai rata-rata hasil sebelum penggunaan bahan ajar bahasa Indonesia berbasis CLIL di perguruan tinggi Kota Bengkulu yang dikembangkan adalah 68,50, dan standar deviasi 13.489 dan setelah menggunakan bahan ajar bahasa Indonesia berbasis CLIL di perguruan tinggi Kota Bengkulu yang telah dikembangkan adalah 80,19 dengan standar deviasi 11.546. Hal ini berarti terdapat perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar mahasiswa sebelum dan sesudah menggunakan pengembangan bahan ajar mata kuliah bahasa Indonesia berbasis CLIL di Perguruan Tinggi Kota Bengkulu.
Kata kunci: ajar, bahasa Indonesia, CLIL
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amiroh, B. (2021). Klugee: Web-Based application for teaching mathematics in english to indonesian elementary school students. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Universitas Ma Chung, 1, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.33479/snumc.v1i.231.
Banegas, D. L., & del Pozo Beamud, M. (2020). Content and language integrated learning: A duoethnographic study about CLIL pre-service teacher education in Argentina and Spain. RELC Journal, 53(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220930442.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M.D. (2007). Educational research: an introduction. University of Michigan: Pearson Education.
Breidbach, S., & Viebrock, B. (2012). CLIL in Germany - results from recent research in a contested field of education. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), pp. 5 – 16.
Cinganotto, L. (2016). CLIL in Italy: A general overview. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), pp. 374 – 400. doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.6.
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL: A Pedagogical approach from the European perspective. Dalam N. Van Deusen-Sholl & N. H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Second and Foreign Language Education. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Depdiknas. (2004). Materi pelatihan terintegrasi bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen.
Depdiknas. (2006). Pedoman memilih dan menyusun bahan ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Sekolah Menengah Pertama, Direktorat Jenderal Manajmen.
Depdiknas. (2006b). Pedoman memilih dan menyusun bahan ajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction. 6th. New York: Longmann.
Dikdasmen. (2003). Kerangka Dasar Pengembangan Silabus dan Sistem Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa SLTP Berbasis kompetensi (Dirjen Dikdasmen).
Dikdasmen. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar (Dirjen Dikdasmen).
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. 2013. Materi kuliah mata kuliah bahasa Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Republik Indonesia.
Hu, H. (2022). Factors pertinent to first language use in foreign language classroom: A case of content and language integrated learning. Center for Open Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nwtd4.
Hu, J., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2020). Understanding subject teachers’ language-related pedagogical practices in content and language integrated learning classrooms. Language Awareness, 30(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1768265.
Jiang, P., Akhter, S., Azizi, Z., Gheisari, A., & Kumar, T. (2022). Exploring the role of content and language integrated learning approach in developing transversal skills in university students with respect to the mediating role of emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988494.
Juangsih, J. (2021). Students’ perceptions on CLIL based material development of Japanese language for tourism. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211119.062.
Khoiriyah, K. (2021). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in Indonesian context: an overview. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 11(3), 587–601. https://doi.org/22480.
Kurniady, H. K. (2008). Pemanfaatan model pembelajaran menulis karya ilmiah secara kolaboratif dengan menggunakan teknik portofolio dalam mata kuliah umum bahasa Indonesia. Disertasi. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Mahan, K. R. (2020). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879.
Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: University Pre.ss.
Marsh, D. 2002. CLIL-EMILE The European dimension: action, trent and foresight potential. Brussels: European Commission.
Marsh, D., Maljers, A. & Hartiala, A. K.(2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms language open door. Jyvaskyla:University of Jyvaskyla.
Marsh et al. _2010). European Framework for CLIL teacher education. Handbook: European Centre for Modern Languages.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2013. Metode penelitian kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muktamir, M., & Rohmah, I. I. T. (2022). The use of teacher’s observation for assessing students’ English performance in CLIL. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 9(1), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v9i1.2408.
Nation, I. S. P., & John, M. (2010). Language Curriculum Design (1st edition). Routledge: New York.
Naves, T., & Victoria, M. (20109. CLIL in Catalonia: An Overview of Researc Studies, dalam Lasagabaster dan Zarobe (eds), CLIL and Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Nikula, T. 2010. Effects of CLIL on Teacher’s Classroom Language Use. Dalam Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula, & Ute Smit (eds.), Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classroom. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Qizi, M. M. R. (2022). Benefits and challenges of content and language integrated learning. Ta’lim Fidoyilari, 15–08(1).
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik. Indonesia No. 41 tahun 2007, tentang Standar Proses.
Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 19 Tahun 2005. Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan. 2012. Penilaian Buku Teks Pelajaran.
http://puskurbuk.net/web/penilian-buku-teks-pelajaran.html (Diunduh 26April 2022).
Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor: 84/E/KPT/2020 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Mata Kuliah Wajib Pada Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi.
Sakinah, N., Sulisusiawan, A., & Abdussamad, A. (2022). Kesesuaian isi buku teks bahasa Indonesia SMK/MAK terbitan yudhistira dengan kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i5.54749.
Tang, J., & Foley, J. (2022). A case study on the effectiveness of applying content and language integrated learning in an artificial intelligence English reading course. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.15.
Tim Pengembang MKDP Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran UPI. 2011. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: UPI.
Trisiana, A. & Wartoyo. (2016). Desain Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Melalui Addie Model Untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Mahasiswa di Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta. PKn Progresif, 11(1), pp. 313-330.
Wahyu, R., Setiawan, S., & Anam, S. (2022). Translanguaging as a scaffolded practice in a primary school content and language integrated learning context during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2043–2055. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2043.
Wahyuningsih, P. I., Nuryatin, A., & Pristiwati, R. (2022). Pengembangan Media Interaktif Berbasis Adobe Flash dengan Pendekatan Content And Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Siswa SD. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 1990–2001. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2312.
Xanthou, M. (2011). The Impact of CLIL On L2 Vocabulary Development and Content Knowledge. English Teaching, Vol. 10 (4). Pp. 116-126. http://Education.Waikato.Ac.Nz/Research/Files/Etpc/Files/2011v10n4art7.Pdf.
Yang, W. (2014). National Appraisal and Stakeholder Perceptions of a Tertiary CLIL Programme in Taiwan. 2(1).
Yufrizal. (2021). The impact of project based-CLIL on students’ english proficiency. LPPM-UNILA Institutional Repository (LPPM-UNILA-IR). http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/28088/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v21i3.54138
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
______________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Litera Journal is published by the Faculty of Languages, Arts, and Culture Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Himpunan Sarjana Kesusasteraan Indonesia (HISKI)
The International Journal of Linguistic, Literature, and Its Teaching at http://http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
__________________________________________________________________________________________________