Email this article 
The Effectivenessof Subject Specific Pedagogy Based on Problem-Based Learning to Empower Student’s Ecological Literacy
Baskoro Adi Prayitno, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Puguh Karyanto, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Abstract
Abstract:This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) based Problem-Based Learning (PBL) to empower the students' ecological literacy at Sebelas Maret University. This research was conducted on Biology Education Program of FKIP UNS. The research design used was posttest-only control design. The sample of the research is 6th semester student with the number of 46 as experiment class and 7th semester student with amount 57 as control class. The posttest value of ecological literacy for the experimental class was 80.77% while the control class was 68.14%. The result of posttest of ecological literacy questionnaire was analyzed using independent test of t-test. Result of t test is got sig value = 0,00 (<0,05) so there is difference of ecological literacy between experiment class and control class. This difference is influenced by students who have or are receiving an ecology course in the semester. Therefore, PBL-based SSP tools produce different ecological literacy values in biology education students.
Keywords: Subject Specific Pedagogy, Problem-Based Learning, effectiveness, Ecological Literacy
Keefektivan Subject Specific Pedagogy Berbasis Problem-Based Learning untuk Memberdayakan Ecological Literacy Mahasiswa
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektivan Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) berbasis Problem-Based Learning (PBL) untuk memberdayakan literasi ekologi mahasiswa di Universitas Sebelas Maret. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah posttest-only control design. Sampel penelitiannya merupakan mahasiswa semester 6 dengan jumlah 46 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan mahasiswa semester 7 dengan jumlah 57 sebagai kelas kontrol. Didapatkan nilai posttest literasi ekologi untuk kelas eksperimen sebesar 80,77% sedangkan kelas kontrol sebesar 68,14%. Hasil posttest kuisioner literasi ekologi dianalisis menggunakan uji beda dengan menggunakan independent t-test. Hasil uji t didapatkan nilai sig=0,00 (<0,05) sehingga terdapat perbedaan literasi ekologi antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Perbedaan ini dipengaruhi oleh mahasiswa yang sudah atau sedang menerima mata kuliah ekologi di semesternya. Oleh sebab itu, perangkat SSP berbasis PBL menghasilkan perbedaan nilai literasi ekologi pada mahasiswa pendidikan biologi.
Kata Kunci: Subject Specific Pedagogy, Problem-Based Learning, Keefektivan, Literasi Ekologi
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., & Cote, N. G. (2011). Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accurary in the Theory of Planned Behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 101-117.
Al-Dajeh, H. I. (2012). Assessing Environmental Literacy of Pre-vocational Education Teachers in Jordan. College Student Journal, 492-507.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2014). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen: Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer.
Barrows, H., & Kelson, A. (1993). Problem-based learning in secondary education and the Problem-based Learning Institute (Monograph). Southern Illinois University School of Medicine: Springfield.
Brown, A. L. (1995). The advancement of learning. Educ. Res, 4-12.
Chu, H.-E. e. (2007). “Korean Year 3 Children’s Environmental Literacy: A Prerequisite for a Korean Environmental Education Curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 731-746.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, 453–494.
DeChano, L. (2006). A multy-country examination of the relationship between environmental knowledge and attitude. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education.
Dunlap, R. E. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 10-19.
Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 425-442.
Eurobarometer. (2008). Attitudes of European Citizens toward the Environmental. Europa: Special Eurobarometers 295.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predicators of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 59-74.
Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 455-474.
Fisher, J. D., Fisher, W. A., Williams, S. S., & Malloy, T. E. (1994). Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS-preventive behavior with gay men and heterosexual university students. Health Psychology, 283-250.
Hart, E. (1978). Examination of BSCS Biology and Nonbiology Student’s Ecology Comprehension, Environmental Information Level, and Environmental Attitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 75-78.
Hartati, T., & dkk. (2009). Productive Pedagogy & Subject Spesific Pedagogy. Bandung: UPI Bandung.
Hawcroft, L., & Milfont, T. (2010). Use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 143-158.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 235-266.
Hooi, K. K., Hassan, F., & Mat, M. C. (2012). An Exploratory Study of Readiness and Development of Green University Framework in Malaysia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 525-536.
Irham, M., & Wiyani, N. A. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.
IUCN. (2002). Education and Sustainability Responding to the Global Challenge. Cambridge UK: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
Kallas, E. V., Solovjeva, T. P., & Minakova, L. Y. (2015). Implementation of Ecological Education in a Higher School. Procedia- Sosial and Behavioral Sciences, 453-459.
Kiker, G., T.S, B., A, V., P.T, S., & I, L. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 95-108.
Kollmus, A., & Agyemen, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 239-260.
Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kopnina, H. (2011). Applying The New Ecological Paradigm Scale in the Case of Environmental Education: Qualitative Analysis of The Ecological Worldview of Dutch Children. Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice, 374-388.
Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. J. Learn. Sci, 225–262.
Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., & Jorge, L. R. (2015). Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals. AMBIO, 44:154-162.
Maknun, D. (2011, December). Praktikum Proyek Ekologi Berbasis Kondisi Ekobiologis Lokal dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Lingkungan dan Tindakan Konservasi Mahasiswa. Holistik, 1-39.
McBride, B. B., Brewer, C., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere.
McGinn, A. E. (2014). Quantifying and Understanding Ecological Literacy: A Study of First Year Students at Liberial Arts Institutions. Dickinson College Honor Theses, 1-55.
NEEATeam. (t.thn.). Dipetik Mei 1, 2017, dari www.epa.gov: http.epa.gov
Ogunbonde, C. (2013). The NEP Scale: measuring ecological attitude/worldviews in an african context. Enviro Dev Sustain, 15: 1477-1494.
Orr, D. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Post-modern World. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Prayitno, S. M., & Wangid, M. N. (2005). Subject Specific Pedagogy Thematic Integrative Model For The Development Of Students ’ Respect And Responsibility. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 195-207.
Rizki. (2016, December 30). UI Green Matric. Dipetik July 26, 2017, dari www.ui.ac.id: www.ui.ac.id
Roy, R., Potter, S., & Yarrow, K. (2008). Designing low carbon higher education systems Environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 116-130.
Rustaman, N. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: UM PRESS.
Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individual cognition: A dynamic interactional view. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of Problem-based learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1).
School Education Department of Education & Training. (2005). Professional Learning in Effective Schools: The Seven Principles of Highly Effective Professional Learning. Melbourn: Leadership and Teacher Development Branch Office of School Education Department of Education & Training.
Shamuganatha, S., & Karpudewan, M. (2015). Modeling Environmental Literacy of Malaysian Pre-University Students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 757-771.
Stutzman, T. M., & Green, S. B. (1982). Factors affecting energy consumption: two field tests of the Fishbein-Ajzen model. Journal of Social Psychology, 183-201.
Team, U. G. (2016). Guidline of UI GreenMetric World University Ranking 2016. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Ugulu, I., Aydin, H., Yorek, N., & Dogan, Y. (2008). The impact of endemism concept on environmental attitudes of secondary school students. Nature Montenegrina,, 165-173.
UNESCO-UNEP. (1996, June). Education for sustainable development.
UNS, T. G. (2014). Rencana Strategi Pengambangan Green Campus. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1580-1607.
Zverev, I. (1995). Priorities of ecological education. I Moscow scientific-practical conference on continuous ecological education. Moscow: Moscow State University.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.15809
Refbacks
Social Media:
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.
