Email this article 
Technology-based pragmagogy competency assessment to measure teachers' ability in classroom management
Memet Sudaryanto, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
Harun Joko Prayitno, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Hasan Zainnuri, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Abstract
Teachers' classroom management skills can be seen in their language teaching skills. This study aimed to (1) develop an online assessment model to measure teachers' pragmagogy ability in Indonesia and (2) measure teachers' ability to respond to pragmagogy-related stimuli. This study uses a D&D approach to answer the problem formulation determined during model design, development, and evaluation. The sample included 3,150 primary, secondary, and advanced Indonesian teachers. Functionality, reliability, usability, efficiency, maintainability, and portability were validated. This study explained the formulated pragmagogy construction through exploratory factor analysis. Stress testing and installation testing were used to broaden the application's reach. Based on the initial analysis, the online assessment model concludes that the teacher's pragmagogy ability can determine knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Teachers' pragmagogy ability can be determined through pedagogic knowledge as the framework for roles and figures in the form of thinking; reflective and emotional intelligence; ability in instructional communication patterns; and other aspects to realize pragmagogic competence. The use of pragmagogy measurement applications can examine various approaches chosen by teachers to maximize the teaching-learning process in the classroom through interactive, responsive, persuasive, implicative, locution, illocution, perlocution approaches to describe the pragamagogical competencies possessed by teachers in classroom management that is interesting and fun for their students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbot-Smith, K., Williams, D., & Matthews, D. (2020). ‘What’s new for you?’: Interlocutor-specific perspective-taking and language interpretation in autistic and neuro-typical children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 70, 101465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101465.
Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). Springer.
Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning ? Lifelong Learning.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. In Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and Language Teaching: Bringing Pragmatics and Pedagogy Together.
Barkaoui, K. (2016). What Changes and What Doesn’t? An Examination of Changes in the Linguistic Characteristics of Ielts Repeaters ’ Writing Task 2 Scripts. In IELTS Research Reports. https://www.ielts.org/for-researchers/research-reports/online-series-2016-3.
Bootzin, R. R., & Stevens, S. J. (2005). Adolescents, substance abuse, and the treatment of insomnia and daytime sleepiness. Clinical Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.007.
Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intelectual ability, learning learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057–1068.
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813.
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2011). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. In Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051255.
Douven, I., & Krżyzanowska, K. (2019). The semantics–pragmatics interface: An empirical investigation. In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications (pp. 81–100). Springer.
Emerson, R. W. (2017). Exploratory factor analysis. In Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1711100313.
Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale Construction and Psychometrics for Social and Personality Psychology. In Scale Construction and Psychometrics for Social and Personality Psychology. Sage Publicacation, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287866.
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning.
Grouws Kristin J, D. a & C., & Cebulla, G. &. (2000). Improving Student Achievement in Mathematics. In International Academy of Education.
Jung, I. (2011). The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 445–464.
Kidwell, T. (2017). Understanding Culture: A Literature Review Comparing Three Cultural Pedagogies. Register Journal, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v10i2.221-233.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. In The Pragmatics of Politeness. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001.
Martin, A. J. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 239–269.
Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2006). A Comprehensive Pedagogical Framework to Develop Pragmatics in the Foreign Language Classroom: The 6Rs Approach. Applied Language Learning, 16(2), 39–63.
Pasquier, P., & Chaib-draa, B. (2005). Agent communication pragmatics: the cognitive coherence approach. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(4), 364–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.03.002.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, Measurement, and Improvement of Classroom Processes: Standardized Observation can Leverage Capacity. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374.
Prayitno, H.J., Markhamah, Nasucha, Y., Huda, M., Ratih, K., Ubaidullah, Rohmadi, M., Boeriswati, E., Thambu, N., Prophetic Educational Values in the Indonesian Language Textbook: Pillars of Positive Politeness and Character Education, HELIYON, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2022.e10016.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving Content Validity of Self-Regulated Learning Scale (The comparison of Aiken index and Expanded Gregory Index). REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.
Rohmadi, M., Sadhhono, K., & Sudaryanto, M. (2021). A Creative Library Management in Digital Era in Indonesia from Psychopragmatic Perspective. Webology, 18(Special Issue on Information Retrieval and Web Search), 332–343.
Rohmadi, M., Ulya, C., Wulansari, K., Putri, U. R., & Sudaryanto, M. (2021). Comparative Study of Persuasive Directive Speech on Printed and Digital Media Advertising. MICOSS 2020: Proceedings of the 1st MICOSS Mercu Buana International Conference on Social Sciences, MICOSS 2020, September 28-29, 2020, Jakarta, Indonesia, 41.
Ryabova, M. (2015). Politeness Strategy in Everyday Communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.033
Sudaryanto, M., Mardapi, D., & Hadi, S. (2019a). Multimedia-Based online Test on Indonesian Language Receptive Skills Development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1339(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012120
Sudaryanto, M., Mardapi, D., & Hadi, S. (2019b). Applying Item Response Theory In Validating An Indonesian Language Profeciency Test. First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-3-2019.2284880
Sudaryanto, M., Ulya, C., Rohmadi, M., & Kuhafeesah, K. (2020). Inter-rater Assessment on Listening Media for Foreign Language Speakers. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.9-11-2019.2295064
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310.
Utomo, M. N. Y., Sudayanto, M., & Saddhono, K. (2020). Tools and strategy for distance learning to respond COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Ingénierie Des Systèmes d’Information, 25(3), 383–390.
Van Den Dool, P., & Kirschner, P. (2003). Integrating the Educative Functions of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in teachers’ and learners’ toolboxes: a reflection on pedagogical benchmarks for ICT in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 161–179.
Zyoud, M. M. (2016). Theoretical Perspective on How To Develop Speaking Skill. An International Multidisciplinary Journal.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.52599
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Social Media:
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.
