Child-friendly school-based learning management model for health and physical education

Raden Sunardianta; Lantip Diat Prasojo; Hari Yuliarto; Firmansyah Firmansyah

doi:10.21831/cp.v43i2.64652

Child-friendly school-based learning management model for health and physical education

Raden Sunardianta, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Lantip Diat Prasojo, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Hari Yuliarto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Firmansyah Firmansyah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/cp.v43i2.64652

Abstract

Developing learning management models is crucial to address the diverse needs of effective learning while promoting active participation, preventing discrimination, and safeguarding students' rights and responsibilities in line with their growth. This article aims to create a child-friendly school-based learning model for health and physical education in elementary schools and validate it through expert assessments. Following Brog and Gall's model development approach, data collection involved assessment questionnaires administered to various stakeholders, including school supervisors, principals, teachers, students, and committees. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating diverse learning methods, adequate infrastructure, gender sensitivity, and meaningful learning experiences into the model. The three sequential stages' assessment results demonstrate the proposed model's high feasibility, scoring consistently high across stages. Referred to as a model, this innovative model showcases significant promise, suggesting further refinement to ensure its efficacy in addressing multifaceted learning requirements, fostering inclusive participation, and upholding students' rights and obligations per their developmental stage. This study highlights the need for evolving learning management models to cater to diverse educational needs effectively.

Keywords

child-friendly school; health and physical education; learning management model

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable E-Learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13(16), 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453

Alamer, A. (2022a). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor ESEM for construct validation purposes: Guidelines and applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100005

Alamer, A. (2022b). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor ESEM for construct validation purposes: Guidelines and applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 100005.

Binyamin, S. S., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2019). Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of learning management systems in Saudi Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(03), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2

Driscoll, M. P., & Burner, K. J. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Pearson.

Ekeh, M. C., & Venketsamy, R. (2021). Ensuring child-friendly learning environments in Nigerian Early Childhood Centers (pp. 677–703). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44217-0_37

Fitriani, S., Istaryatiningtias, I., & Qodariah, L. (2021). A child-friendly school: How the school implements the model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1), 273. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20765

Flora, D. B., & Flake, J. K. (2017). The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research: Decisions for scale development and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 49(2), 78.

Fullan, M. (2016). The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9289-1

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2010). Applying educational research: How to read, do, and use research to solve problems of practice. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FSfSHwAACAAJ

Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: An Introduction and Orientation. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). Springer.

Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 904–907.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling (pp. 1–29). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1

Hajaroh, M., Rukiyati, R., Purwastuti, L. A., & Nurhayati, R. (2021). Development of the evaluation instrument of the child-friendly school policy in elementary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14319a

Hills, A. P., Dengel, D. R., & Lubans, D. R. (2015). Supporting public health priorities: Recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 57(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.010

Kline, R. B. (2012). Assumptions in structural equation modeling. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 111, 125.

Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002

Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. S. (2009). Shaping The College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Context. John Wiley & Sons.

McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2013). Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. Ascd.

Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional models in physical education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213521

Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Muhaimin, M., & Prasojo, L. D. (2020). Exploring the drivers predicting behavioral intention to use m-Learning management system: Partial least square structural equation model. IEEE Access, 8, 181356–181365. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028474

O’Flaherty, J., & McCormack, O. (2019). Student holistic development and the ‘goodwill’ of the teacher. Educational Research, 61(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1591167

World Health Organization. (2003). Creating an environment for emotional and social well-being: an important responsibility of a health promoting and child-friendly school. World Health Organization.

Ornstein, A. C., Levine, D. U., Gutek, G., & Vocke, D. E. (2016). Foundations of education. Cengage learning.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. ASCD.

Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5.

Saptono, B. (2022). Implications of child-friendly school policies in reducing cases of violence against children in elementary schools. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.45816

Sharma, M., & Sharma, S. (2023). A holistic approach to remote patient monitoring, fueled by ChatGPT and Metaverse technology: The future of nursing education. Nurse Education Today. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691723002666

Siswanto, H. (2012). Pendidikan kesehatan unsur utama dalam pendidikan anak usia dini. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i2.1565

Winnick, J. P., & Porretta, D. L. (2016). Adapted physical education and sport. Human Kinetics.

Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology. Pearson Education Limited.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i2.64652