EVALUASI KOMPETENSI PENULISAN TESIS MAHASISWA S2 PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNOLOGI DAN KEJURAN

Putu Sudira; Soenarto Soenarto; Pardjono Pardjono

doi:10.21831/pep.v19i1.4556

EVALUASI KOMPETENSI PENULISAN TESIS MAHASISWA S2 PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNOLOGI DAN KEJURAN

Putu Sudira, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Soenarto Soenarto, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Pardjono Pardjono, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

10.21831/pep.v19i1.4556

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi: (1) kemajuan penulisan tesis; (2) kompetensi penulisan tesis; (3) faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penulisan tesis; (4) faktor-faktor dominan yang mempengaruhi penulisan tesis; (5) tingkat kekreatifan capaian hasil tesis mahasiswa S2 Program Studi Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (PTK). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian evaluasi formatif bersifat internal dilaksanakan pada bulan Mei hingga Oktober 2014. Responden penelitian mahasiswa S2 PTK angkatan 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 sebanyak 59 orang. Pengumpulan data menggunakan angket skala Likert dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kemaju-an penulisan tesis termasuk kategori sangat baik. Kompetensi mahasiswa dalam penulisan tesis termasuk kategori sangat baik. Penulisan tesis dipengaruhi oleh faktor dalam dan luar kampus. Faktor-faktor dominan yang mempengaruhi penulisan tesis adalah ketersediaan waktu diskusi dengan dosen pembimbing, kemampuan menerapkan metode penelitian dan analisis data, beban tugas di tempat kerja, kemampuan memahami literatur asing, dukungan dosen pembim-bing, proses administrasi Pascasarjana, motivasi cepat lulus, dukungan keluarga, dan beasiswa. Tingkat kekreatifan mahasiswa dalam penulisan tesis termasuk kategori sangat baik.

Kata kunci: evaluasi, penulisan tesis, kompetensi mahasiswa, Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan

______________________________________________________________

EVALUATION OF THESIS WRITING COMPETENCE OF MASTER’S DEGREE STUDENTS ON VOCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate: (1) the progress of writing a thesis; (2) the competence of writing a thesis; (3) factors that influence the writing of the thesis; (4) the dominant factors that influence the writing of the thesis; (5) creativity of students in writing a thesis. This study was an internal formative evaluation conducted in May and October 2014. Respondents of this study were master degree students on Vocational and Technology Education Study Programs class of 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 as many as 59 people. The data were collected using questionnaires and interviews. The data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis techniques. The results showed that the progress of the thesis was classified in the excellent category. The competence of students in writing thesis was classified in very well category. Thesis writing is influenced by internal and exsternal campus factors. The dominant factors affecting the thesis were the availability of a discussion with the supervisor, the ability to apply research methods and data analysis, workload in the workplace, the ability to understand foreign literatur, supervisor support, administrative processes, motivation to pass quickly, family support, and scholarship. The level of creativity of students was clasified in the excellent category.

Keywords: evaluation, thesis, student competence, Vocational and Technology Education

Keywords

evaluasi; penulisan tesis; kompetensi mahasiswa; Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Billet, S. (2011). Vocational education: purposes, traditions, and prospects. London: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Brooks, W.F. (1972). A self-evaluation supplement universities associated for research and education pathology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Emmerik, I.J.H. V., Bakker, A.B., & Euwema, M.C. (2009). Explaining employees’ evaluations of organizational change with the job-demands resources model. Career Development International Journal, 14(6), 594-613.

Gabrill, E., & Gibbs, L. (2009). Critical thinking for helping professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hansen, R. (2009). The pedagogical roots of technical learning and thinking. In R. Maclean, D. Wilson, & C. Chinien (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning (pp. 5-18). Bon: Springer.

Heinz, W.R. (2009). Redefining the Status of Occupations. In R. Maclean, D. Wilson, & C. Chinien (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning (pp. 19-40). Bon: Springer Science+Business Media.

Hollander, A., & Mar, N.Y. (2009). Towards achieving TVET for all: the role of the unesco-unevoc international centre for technical and vocational education and training. In R. Maclean, D. Wilson, & C. Chinien (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning (pp. 41-58). Bon: Springer.

Levitt, T. (2002). Creativity is not enough. Retrieved April 16, 2014, from http://hbr.org/2002/08/creativity-is-not-enough/ar/1

Pavlova, M. (2009). Technology and vocational education for sustainable development: empowering individuals for the future. Queensland: Springer Science Business Media B.V.

Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st-century skills: how to embed creativity into the curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Pop, R. (2005). Creativity, history, theory, practice. New York: Routledge.

Rojewski, J.W. (2009). A conceptual framework for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. In R. Maclean, D. Wilson, & C. Chinien (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning (pp. 19-40). Bon: Springer.

Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative research: principles and practice in public service and social action programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4556